Friday, February 27, 2015

Nonfiction Check In

Nathan and I are considering a double-sided topic about myth and fairy tales, covering the two sides of myth.  There's the side that covers the supernatural and extraterrestrial, and then there's fairy tales.  Some questions we were considering are, first, to answer 'what is "myth"?', and 'why do people believe in myths when experts and peers say otherwise?'

We are fairly sure that we are going to do a documentary on our project, with some interviews from our experts taped (if possible).  We were thinking of starting out trying to answer the question of what is myth, then moving into our research.  We aren't EXACTLY sure about what our final question(s) will be.


When I first had the idea, I thought that I would get a lot of people saying that they didn't believe in myths and that those who did believe in myths or "fairy tales" would believe because they want to believe in those things.  I thought that I would get a lot of varying definitions of myth and lots of feedback.


Nathan and I have checked out those online sources that you showed us, but we don't know where to look on those and so far have only gotten one source from those.  We've found a lot of online stuff about fairy tales and supernatural stuff, but we haven't really looked in print.  We're going to set up a call with someone in the mythology department at Harvard, and also at the U of MN and St. Cloud State University.


We've already sent out a survey of people in our class, and we would like to have email addresses so that we can send a survey to kids at the high school and teachers.  We would like a wide range of ages and grades.


As I mentioned before, we are going to try and talk with someone at Harvard, as well as the before-mentioned colleges.    We would like to find more experts in this topic.  We've had a lot of varied responses collected from our survey, from people on both sides: those who believe in myths and those who don't.  A lot of people who believe in "fairy tales" and such say that we haven't completely explored the universe and those mythical things could exist.  They believe because they want to believe.


We're having trouble narrowing down our topic to a question or two we really want to answer and need some help.  Any of the information we have collected would help any question we want to ask in the "myth" area.


We're going to start planning out how to fit it all together into one big cohesive project that can be turned into a script for our documentary.  We also need to narrow down our topic and call the people at Harvard and the U of MN.  We need to find more experts and we're going to survey more people.


That's our nonfiction project currently!


-bookhouse4


http://www.afsnet.org/?page=AboutAFS

Lots of our sources are PDFs - I didn't want to embed them.  They're all in our nonfiction folder.

Thursday, February 12, 2015

What public school systems and their schools are doing wrong

Many schools advertise "doing what is best" for their students, or that their school district is "one of the best" schools in their area.  They say that they are "committed to academic excellence" or announce some other benefit along that line.  What many people and students don't know is that schools are teaching students the wrong things about life and the real world.  In many ways, they are lying to their students about what life is and how it should be handled.

Classes in schools are set up in such a way as to teach students the "right" way to do things or the "correct" facts and information.  Lessons are usually taught and arranged in this order:

  1. The teacher stands up in front of the class and talks about or shows how to do something and presents information and facts.
  2. The students are given time in class to learn more about that subject or topic, according to how the teacher arranges it or tells the students how to do it.
  3. The students are assigned homework or projects to "test" them on their knowledge, which they have not had time to explore.
  4. The assignment is to be turned in the next day or within a few days.
  5. Students who do not turn in assignments on time, answer a question wrong, or do not complete a project to the specifications of the teacher are given a lower grade, or points are taken off.
Students are punished for trying to do something that they have only been told how to do, but never actually tried experimenting with to see if they can understand it.  If too many of these "mistakes" or "errors" in work are made, the student may not pass the class.  

This is only teaching them that they need to get everything right and perfect so that they can "pass" important parts of their life.  This is setting students up to believe that everything must be perfect for them to be successful in later life.  To "pass" life.

Life is not arranged on a pass-or-fail basis.  What happens in life happens and cannot be reversed.  Schools point out to students that you need the skills you are learning in class to get a job and be successful.  To be successful, you have to "pass" courses, and turn in many, many assignments.  If those assignments are not "perfect", then points are docked, and grades are lowered.  The problem with this thinking is that it has been rooted in our minds for many years, making us believe that jobs and life work just like school assignments do.

Many jobs do require perfection - such as in engineering - to gain clients for their company, or just to make people happy.  To fully complete the project that has been assigned to them, engineers must complete the project to the best of their ability - and also must complete it on time.  But many is not all.  There are some jobs in which experimenting is important.  Going out on a limb and risking something may contribute to society in a positive way.  That is how inventing works.  Scientists use experimentation for many things, and science is a wide job area.  Not everything in life conforms to the "perfection" rule, and yet students learn this every day.  Every day it is ingrained more deeply into their thoughts and work.

Clearly, the way classes are taught needs to change.  Students should be allowed to try things in school - and experiment in their education - to learn in a hands-on experience.  One change that can occur is in the way topics are presented to students.  

Instead of teaching the subject, then letting students try it, teachers should allow students to experiment with the subject and try it themselves first.  They may do horribly, but at least they learned what they did wrong.  Then teachers would be able to teach them the right way and let them do it again.  This is the learning process.  Students would be able to figure things out faster if they got to try it once before and something went wrong.  They know how to fix it.

The problem many people - and school staff - may point out is that this method will take longer, and thus teachers may not be able to accomplish everything during the school year.  This is a logical problem.  Trial-and-error has been known to take longer.  But one advantage that trial-and error has is that the more options that you investigate, the faster you can eliminate the next options you have.

What is also interesting is how this connects to why some students hate school and love video games.  Video games allow people (mainly kids) to take risks and be able to start the level over or try again.
"A Game Over is an event which occurs whenever Link [the main character] is killed...Typically, the player will get the option to continue, save, or continue from a certain location such as the origin," states an entry on Zeldapedia, a video gaming information website.

Most video games follow this standard, and kids and adults like that they can always try again when they fail.  They've even learned that whatever they did that caused them to fail is not an option they should try.  When students are allowed to take risks in school and not be punished for it, they actually want to learn.  

If school is a precursor to life, then students should be allowed to figure it out and take risks to learn what not to do when they are older - when it really counts toward their personal success.  If we give students the chance to be wrong in school, then they don't have any reason to be wrong in life.  They can be more successful, knowing what the risks are and how to handle them.


This subject also applies to how students learn.  "...I said in that interview that the only way we learn is by doing-" explains Roger C. Schank, an expert in many fields and a professor at Northwester University.  "-and to do that we must practice constantly.  Schools rarely teach doing."  To learn something, you have to try it.  Trying involves risk.  Risk can lead to failure, but at least you learned something.


You have to be wrong to be right.  "If we’re inventing a new business model or writing a new piece of music or experimenting with new ways to increase the yield of an email campaign, of course we have to be willing to be wrong," says Seth Godin.  Earlier on in this writing, Godin also pointed out that in some workplaces, perfection is required, but perfection is different for everyone.  Even if employees don't get it completely perfect, that doesn't mean that they have "failed" life.  If they lose their job, they can start again at a different job.  Life is not over.


What should be taught in schools is how to get into doing things.  Taking risks and trying things out before the "real world".  If schools want to teach students the truth about life, all that is required is a reversal of the way we think about failure and risks.


-bookhouse4


To read or hear more about this, check out the following sources:

Tuesday, February 10, 2015

Life is pass-or-fail: what today's schools are teaching their students - DRAFT

Some of the best schools in the world produce students that are eventually very successful in life, yet their school lives are plagued with the strain of getting good grades and "passing" each course.  It is stressed in schools that students must pass so many courses, or do so many things, just to be successful in life later on, as well as in school.

This grueling setup of many school systems is pushing many students to the limit, including those students in advanced classes.  Choosing to change the way that classes are run, and teaching students that taking risks helps the learning process, are ways that we can teach the next generation how to be successful.


Clearly, the way classes are taught needs to change.  As an eighth grader entering a high school that has high standards for students, I feel that I am being pressured to pass everything, and be "perfect" in order to "pass" life - being successful after my education is complete.  Life is not on a pass or fail basis, but rather on a "what happens, happens, and education may help solve some of my problems later on" basis.


Many classes require a C+ or - more often - an A or B average to pass.  This grade is hard to attain, especially because of the expectations of classes.  There are usually many assignments that must be turned in on time - else the student risk dropping a grade or two - and there is very little room for error or experimentation.  Students are getting punished for experimenting and trying something new.


School is a where students should be able to take risks and learn from their mistakes before they move out into the real world.  School is a time for experimenting and figuring out your life before the end of high school and college.  If teachers teach everything first, then tell students to try it out for themselves, students aren't really learning and can't take those risks to learn about their world.


In the schools of today, students are basically being taught that life can be "passed" or "failed" just like classes in school.  "Passing" equals success, and "failing" is not getting what you want out of life.


This kind of teaching and learning in classroom can have a negative impact on students' future lives.  Whether working for a company every day, or trying to solve the world's problems, experimenting is a large part of any job or experience in the "real world".  If students learn in school that everything has to be "perfect", their lives will be just that: careful and precise, with no big discoveries or experimentation.


This loss of experimentation at a young age can be detrimental to jobs and occupations, especially those based in science and social studies/geography.  The majority of a scientists job is to experiment and try new things, and geologists and those studying different groups must branch out and try new tactics and ideas.


I'm sure that many schools would not like to hear that they are hurting their students' education, and I can assure you that there is an easy fix to this problem.  Many classes just need to shift their teaching styles and priorities.  Instead of teaching what is, start allowing students to try it first, then show them the correct way and have them try it again.  This method may take longer, but students will do it better the second time.


If school is a precursor to the "real world" and "real life", then school should be about learning from mistakes and making yourself a better person - not showing that taking a risk is bad and all experimentation should be taught.  If schools don't want to teach that the world is all pass-or-fail, then all that is required to change is the way things are taught.


-bookhouse4